The instruction of a laboratory lesson on the Internet with STEM-based hands-on activities: Electrochemistry sampling

Hilal Karabulut; Naime Elcan Kaynak; İshak Afşin Kariper

doi:10.29333/pr/15156

Full Text (PDF)

Hilal Karabulut ¹ , Naime Elcan Kaynak ¹ , İshak Afşin Kariper ¹ ^*

More Detail

¹ Faculty of Education, Erciyes University, Kayseri, TÜRKİYE^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study examines pre-service science teachers’ opinions about STEM-supported hands-on activities and emergency remote teaching performed in laboratory courses during the pandemic. It was conducted with 14 pre-service teachers; they were asked to design an experiment by integrating STEM concepts and hands-on activities. The participants designed seven activities in the process. Data collection tools used in the study were expert evaluation, self-assessment, peer review, and interview forms. The data obtained from these tools were subjected to qualitative analysis. The entire process was carried out through online portals due to the pandemic. The study results indicate that the participants discovered the concepts of STEM, designed hands-on activities, and enjoyed the learning process. In addition, they suggested that laboratory courses enriched with STEM and hands-on activities can be an alternative to existing learning, and they were minimally affected by the adverse effects of the pandemic.

Keywords

electrochemistry
emergency remote teaching
hands-on learning
high school
laboratory instruction
multidisciplinary
physical chemistry

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

PEDAGOGICAL RES, Volume 9, Issue 4, October 2024, Article No: em0223

https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15156

Publication date: 01 Oct 2024

Online publication date: 11 Sep 2024

Article Views: 288

Article Downloads: 254

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Achuthan, K., Raghavan, D., Shankar, B., Francis, S. P., & Kolil, V. K. (2021). Impact of remote experimentation, interactivity and platform effectiveness on laboratory learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00272-z
Ajayi, V. O., & Ogbeba, J. (2017). Effect of gender on senior secondary chemistry students’ achievement in stoichiometry using hands-on activities. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(8), 839-842. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-5-8-1
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2011.00109.x
Brinkmann, S. (2014). Interview. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 1008-1010). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_161
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028999
Chonkaew, P., Sukhummek, B., & Faikhamta, C. (2019). STEM activities in determining stoichiometric mole ratios for secondary-school chemistry teaching. Journal of Chemical Education, 96(6), 1182-1186. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00985
Christensen, R., Knezek, G., & Tyler-Wood, T. (2015). Alignment of hands-on STEM engagement activities with positive STEM dispositions in secondary school students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(6), 898-909. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9572-6
Elkhatat, A. M., & Al-Muhtaseb, S. A. (2021). Hybrid online-flipped learning pedagogy for teaching laboratory courses to mitigate the pandemic COVID-19 confinement and enable effective sustainable delivery: Investigation of attaining course learning outcome. SN Social Sciences, 1, Article 113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-021-00117-6
Fuchs, K. (2022). The difference between emergency remote teaching and e-learning. Frontiers in Education, 7, Article 921332. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.921332
Furlan, P. Y. (2009). Engaging students in early exploration of nanoscience topics using hands-on activities and scanning tunneling microscopy. Journal of Chemical Education, 86(6), Article 705. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed086p705
Glaroudis, D., Iossifides, A., Spyropoulou, N., Zaharakis, I. D., & Kameas, A. D. (2019). STEM learning and career orientation via IoT hands-on activities in secondary education. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (pp. 480-485). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PERCOMW.2019.8730759
Hallett, J., & De, S. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 on education in healthcare and STEM. AIJR Preprints, 275. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36137.21607
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hodson, D. (2001). What counts as good science education? In D. Hodson (Ed.), OISE papers in the STSE education, volume 2 (pp. 1-21). OISE.
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. (2004). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88, 28-54. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10106
Högström, P., Ottander, C., & Benckert, S. (2010). Lab work and learning in secondary school chemistry: The importance of teacher and student interaction. Research in Science Education, 40, 505-523 . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9131-3
Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40(5), 743-757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9142-0
Jimenez, Z. (2019). Teaching and learning chemistry via augmented and immersive virtual reality. In R. E. Belford, & T. Gupta (Eds.), Technology integration in chemistry education and research (pp. 31-52). ACS Publications. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019-1318.ch003
Karpudewan, M., & Daman Huri, N. H. (2023). Interdisciplinary electrochemistry STEM-lab activities replacing the single disciplinary electrochemistry curriculum for secondary schools. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(2), 998-1010. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.2c00469
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). Conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kibga, E. S., Gakuba, E., & Sentongo, J. (2021). Developing students’ curiosity through chemistry hands-on activities: A case of selected community secondary schools in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(5), Article em1962. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10856
King, S., Zhou, N., Fischer, C., Rodriguez, F., & Warschauer, M. (2019). Enhancing student learning and retention in organic chemistry: Benefits of an online organic chemistry preparatory course. In S. Kradtap Hartwell, & T. Gupta (Eds.), From general to organic chemistry: Courses and curricula to enhance student retention (pp. 119-128). American Chemical Association. https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2019- 1341.ch009
Leopold, H., & Smith, A. (2020). Implementing reflective group work activities in a large chemistry lab to support collaborative learning. Education Sciences, 10(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010007
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
Moore, T., Stohlmann, M., Wang, H., Tank, K., Glancy, A., & Roehrig, G. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In S. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 35-60). Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq7bh.7
Morais, C. (2015). Storytelling with chemistry and related hands-on activities: Informal learning experiences to prevent “chemophobia” and promote young children’s scientific literacy. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(1), 58-65. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed5002416
Ottander, C., & Grelsson, G. (2006). Learning outcome and assessment of laboratory work: The teachers’ perspective. Journal of Biological Education, 40(3), 113-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656027
Pagoto, S., Lewis, K. A., Groshon, L., Palmer, L., Waring, M. E., Workman, D., De Luna, N., & Brown, N. P. (2021). STEM undergraduates’ perspectives of instructor and university responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Spring 2020. PLoS ONE, 16(8), Article e0256213. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256213
Rao, A. R., & Dave, R. (2019). Developing hands-on laboratory exercises for teaching STEM students the internet-of-things, cloud computing and blockchain applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (pp. 191-198). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISECon.2019.8882068
Sedaghatjou, M., Hughes, J., Liu, M., Ferrara, F., Howard, J., & Mammana, M. F. (2021). Teaching STEM online at the tertiary level during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 54(3), 365-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1954251
Spyropoulou, N., Glaroudis, D., Iossifides, A., & Zaharakis, I. D. (2020). Fostering secondary students’ STEM career awareness through IoT hands-on educational activities: Experiences and lessons learned. IEEE Communications Magazine, 58(2), 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.1900288
Tesfamariam, G., Lykknes, A., & Kvittingen, L. (2014). Small-scale chemistry for a hands-on approach to chemistry practical work in secondary schools: Experiences from Ethiopia. African Journal of Chemical Education, 4(3), 48-94.
Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). Active learning is about more than hands-on: A mixed-reality AI system to support STEM education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30, 74-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00194-3
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin Publishing.
Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. SAGE.

How to cite this article

APA

Karabulut, H., Elcan Kaynak, N., & Kariper, İ. A. (2024). The instruction of a laboratory lesson on the Internet with STEM-based hands-on activities: Electrochemistry sampling. Pedagogical Research, 9(4), em0223. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15156

Vancouver

Karabulut H, Elcan Kaynak N, Kariper İA. The instruction of a laboratory lesson on the Internet with STEM-based hands-on activities: Electrochemistry sampling. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2024;9(4):em0223. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15156

AMA

Karabulut H, Elcan Kaynak N, Kariper İA. The instruction of a laboratory lesson on the Internet with STEM-based hands-on activities: Electrochemistry sampling. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2024;9(4), em0223. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15156

Chicago

Karabulut, Hilal, Naime Elcan Kaynak, and İshak Afşin Kariper. "The instruction of a laboratory lesson on the Internet with STEM-based hands-on activities: Electrochemistry sampling". Pedagogical Research 2024 9 no. 4 (2024): em0223. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15156

Harvard

Karabulut, H., Elcan Kaynak, N., and Kariper, İ. A. (2024). The instruction of a laboratory lesson on the Internet with STEM-based hands-on activities: Electrochemistry sampling. Pedagogical Research, 9(4), em0223. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15156

MLA

Karabulut, Hilal et al. "The instruction of a laboratory lesson on the Internet with STEM-based hands-on activities: Electrochemistry sampling". Pedagogical Research, vol. 9, no. 4, 2024, em0223. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/15156