Realist hands-on learning approach and its contributions to learners’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills on solid geometry

Girma Tessema; Kassa Michael; Solomon Areaya

doi:10.29333/pr/14096

Full Text (PDF)

Girma Tessema ¹ ^* , Kassa Michael ¹ , Solomon Areaya ¹

More Detail

¹ Department of Science and Mathematics Education, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, ETHIOPIA^* Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the application of a realist hands-on learning approach and its contributions to optimizing the solid geometry conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills of students. It employed a non-equivalent pre-/post-test quasi-experimental research design. The results showed that there was a statistically significant mean difference between the intervention group and the comparison group, with an effect size of d=.825 for the students’ solid geometry conceptual understanding and d=.930 for the students’ problem-solving skills. Furthermore, a strong correlation was observed between students’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills in solid geometry, with an r² of .6413. These indicate that the use of a realist hands-on approach positively contributes to optimizing learners’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills. It also provides contextually relevant learning opportunities; therefore, it is recommended that teachers and concerned bodies employ a realist hands-on approach to make solid geometry learning concrete and practical.

Keywords

Realist-hands-on approach
solid geometry
problem-solving skills
conceptual understanding

License

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Article Type: Research Article

PEDAGOGICAL RES, Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2024, Article No: em0186

https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14096

Publication date: 03 Jan 2024

Article Views: 757

Article Downloads: 510

Open Access References How to cite this article

References

Alghadari, F., & Herman, T. (2018). The obstacles of geometric problem-solving on solid with vector and triangle approach. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132, 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012046
Alghadari, F., Herman, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Factors affecting senior high school students to solve three-dimensional geometry problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0590. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8234
Brown, T. (2016). Rationality and belief in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92, 75-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9670-7
Chusinkunawut, K., Nugultham, K., Wannagatesiri, T., & Fakcharoenphol, W. (2018). Problem solving ability assessment based on design for secondary school students. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 26(3), 1-20.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
Dahlan, J. A., & Wibisono, Y. (2021). The effect of hands-on and computer-based learning activities on conceptual understanding and mathematical reasoning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1419a
Đokić, O. J., Boričić, M. M. D., & Jelić, M. S. (2022). Comparing ICT with physical manipulative supported learning of 3D geometry in elementary school. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(8), 1623-1654. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211001319
Glaeser, G. (2020). Geometry and its applications in arts, nature and technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61398-3
Hidayah, I., Dwijanto D., & Istiandaru A. (2018). Manipulatives and question series for elementary school mathematics teaching on solid geometry. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 649-662. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11344a
Hwang, W.-Y., & Hu, S.-S. (2013). Analysis of peer learning behaviors using multiple representations in virtual reality and their impacts on geometry problem solving. Computers & Education, 62, 308-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.005
Hwang, W.-Y., Hariyanti, U., Abdillah, Y. A., & Chen, H. S. L. (2021). Exploring effects of geometry learning in authentic contexts using ubiquitous geometry app. Educational Technology & Society, 24(3), 13-28.
Istiandaru, A., Istihapsari, V., Prahmana, R. C. I., Setyawan, F., & Hendroanto, A. (2017). Characteristics of manipulative in mathematics laboratory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 943, 012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012023
Jablonski, S., & Ludwig, M. (2023). Teaching and learning of geometry–A literature review on current developments in theory and practice. Education Sciences, 13(7), 682. https://doi.org/10.3390/ educsci13070682
Jones, J. P., & Tiller, M. (2017). Using concrete manipulatives in mathematical instruction. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 45(1), 18-23.
Jones, K., & Tzekaki, M. (2016). Research on the teaching and learning of geometry. In A. Gutiérrez, G. Leder, & P. Boero (Eds.), The second handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: The journey continues (pp. 109-149). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-561-6_4
Juman, Z. A. M. S., Mathavan, M., Ambegedara, A. S., & Udagedara, I. G. (2022). Difficulties in learning geometry component in mathematics and active-based learning methods to overcome the difficulties. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 10(2), 41-58. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v10i2.4299
Kukey, E., Gunes, H., & Genc, Z. (2019). Experiences of classroom teachers on the use of hands-on material and educational software in math education. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(1), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v11i1.4010
Kwon, H., & Capraro, M. M. (2018). The effects of using manipulatives on students learning in problem posing: The instructors’ perspectives. Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(2),35-47. https://doi.org/10.26711/007577152790026
Liggett, R. S. (2017). The impact of use of manipulatives on the math scores of grade 2 students. Brock Education Journal, 26(2), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v26i2.607
Loc, N. P., Oanh, N. P. P., Thao, N. P., De, T. V., & Triet, L. V. M. (2022). Activity theory as a framework for teaching mathematics: An experimental study. Heliyon, 8(10), e10789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10789
Mazana, M. Y., Montero, C. S., & Casmir, R. O. (2020). Assessing students’ performance in mathematics in Tanzania: The teacher’s perspective. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0589. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/7994
Nduka, W., & Ajoke, A.A. (2016). Design-based learning model and senior secondary students’ learning achievement in solid geometry. European Scientific Journal, 12(34), 1857-7881. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n34p272
NEAEA. (2020). Ethiopian sixth national learning assessment of grades 4 and 8 pupils, Addis Ababa. National Educational Assessment and Examinations Agency. http://www.neaea.gov.et/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Sixth-NLA-Grades-4-8-2020.pdf
Ng, O. L., Shi, L., & Ting, F. (2020). Exploring differences in primary students’ geometry learning outcomes in two technology-enhanced environments: Dynamic geometry and 3D printing. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00244-1
Nurudin, M., Riyadi, R., & Subanti, S. (2019). Cooperative learning model using AFL to learn geometry based on creativity perspective. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1188, 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012008
Peltier, C., Morin, K. L., Bouck, E. C., Lingo, M. E., Pulos, J. M., Scheffler, F. A., Suk, A., Mathews, L. A., Sinclair, T. E., & Deardorff, M. E. (2020). A meta-analysis of single-case research using mathematics manipulatives with students at risk or identified with a disability. The Journal of Special Education, 54(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919844516
Pramuditya, S. A., Rozak, A., & Rukmana, D. (2019). Solid geometry educational game based on student’s mathematical understanding. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1360, 012013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1360/1/012013
Purnomo, M. E. R., & Machromah, I. U. (2018). Major difficulty in solid geometry learning for university students: Developing visual spatial skills. In Proceedings of the University of Muhammadiyah Malang’s 1^st International Conference of Mathematics Education (pp. 143-146). https://doi.org/10.2991/incomed-17.2018.31
Rahimi, Z., Anvari, M., & Aghigh, N. (2019). Teaching solid geometry and visual thinking using electronic facilities. In Proceedings of the 13^th Iranian and 7^th National Conference on e-Learning and e-Teaching (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICELET46946.2019.9091670
Riastuti, N., Mardiyana, M., & Pramudya, I. (2017, December). Analysis of students geometry skills viewed from spatial intelligence. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1913, No. 1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016658
Rosli, R., Goldsby, D., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). Using manipulatives in solving and posing mathematical problems. Creative Education, 6(16), 1718-1725. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.616173
Senel Tekin, P., Ilgaz, H., Afacan Adanir, G., Yildirim, D., & Gulbahar, Y. (2020). Flipping e learning for teaching medical terminology: A study of learners’ online experiences and perceptions. Online Learning, 24(2), 76-93. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2030
Tiruneh, D., Hoddinott, J., Rolleston, C., Sabates, R., & Woldehanna, T. (2021). Understanding achievement in numeracy among primary school children in Ethiopia: Evidence from RISE Ethiopia study. RISE. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-RISE-WP_2021/071
Ukobizaba, F., Nizeyimana, G., & Mukuka, A. (2021). Assessment strategies for enhancing students’ mathematical problem-solving skills: A review of literature. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(3), em1945. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9728
Ummah, S. K., In’am, A., & Azmi, R. D. (2019). Creating manipulatives: Improving students’ creativity through project-based learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5093.93-102
Vanshina, E. A., Shevchenko, O. N., Malikova, O. N., Staselko, O. L., & Shusharina, I. V. (2021). The use of modeling in the teaching of geometry and graphic disciplines at the University. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2001, 012022. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2001/1/012022
Verner, I., Massarwe, K., & Bshouty, D. (2019). Development of competencies for teaching geometry through an ethnomathematical approach. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 56, 100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.05.002
Watan, S., & Sugiman. (2018). Exploring the relationship between teachers’ instructional and students’ geometrical thinking levels based on van Hiele theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012122. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012122
Zajda, J. (2021). Constructivist learning theory and creating effective learning environments. In Globalization and education reforms. Globalization, comparative education and policy research (pp. 35-50). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71575-5_3
Zhang, D. (2021). Teaching geometry to students with learning disabilities: Introduction to the special series. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(1), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720959769

How to cite this article

APA

Tessema, G., Michael, K., & Areaya, S. (2024). Realist hands-on learning approach and its contributions to learners’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills on solid geometry. Pedagogical Research, 9(1), em0186. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14096

Vancouver

Tessema G, Michael K, Areaya S. Realist hands-on learning approach and its contributions to learners’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills on solid geometry. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2024;9(1):em0186. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14096

AMA

Tessema G, Michael K, Areaya S. Realist hands-on learning approach and its contributions to learners’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills on solid geometry. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2024;9(1), em0186. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14096

Chicago

Tessema, Girma, Kassa Michael, and Solomon Areaya. "Realist hands-on learning approach and its contributions to learners’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills on solid geometry". Pedagogical Research 2024 9 no. 1 (2024): em0186. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14096

Harvard

Tessema, G., Michael, K., and Areaya, S. (2024). Realist hands-on learning approach and its contributions to learners’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills on solid geometry. Pedagogical Research, 9(1), em0186. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14096

MLA

Tessema, Girma et al. "Realist hands-on learning approach and its contributions to learners’ conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills on solid geometry". Pedagogical Research, vol. 9, no. 1, 2024, em0186. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14096