Pedagogical Research

• Arik, S., Karakaya, F., Cimen, O., & Yilmaz, M. (2021). Determination of secondary education students’ views on distance education applied in the COVID-19 pandemic process. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal], 41(2), 631-659. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.926838
• Avci, B., & Guven, M. (2021). Identifying training needs of in-service teachers for online education. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Journal of Dokuz Eylül University Buca Faculty of Education], 51, 345-367. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.882866
• Bas, G., & Beyhan, O. (2016). Examination of teachers’ self-efficacy perceptions on educational measurement and evaluation in terms of some variables. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 7(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.34199
• Baskonus, T. (2018). Examination of attitudes and qualifications related to measurement and evaluation of physical education and sports teachers [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. Sakarya University.
• Dommeyer, C. J., Baum, P., Hanna, R. W., & Chapman, K. S. (2004). Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online survey: Their effect on response rates and evaluations. Measurement and evaluation in Higher Education, 29(5), 611-623. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930410001689171
• Dong C., Lee, D. W. C., & Aw, C. W. (2020). Tips for medical educators on how to conduct effective online teaching in times of social distancing. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare, 30(1), 59-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/2010105820943907
• Donovan, J., Mader, C., & Shinsky, J. (2007). Online vs. traditional course evaluation formats: Student perception. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(3) 158-180.
• Ehlers, U. D. (2013). Open learning cultures: A guide to quality, evaluation, and assessment for future learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38174-4
• Ergul, A. O. (2019). Examination of teachers’ assessment literacy levels in terms of some variables [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Hacettepe University.
• Eygu, H., & Eygu, S. (2022). Factors affecting perceived learning satisfaction in distance education in Turkey. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 51(3), 1769-1790. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.1177360
• García-Martínez, J. A., Rosa-Napal, F. C., Romero-Tabeayo, I., López-Calvo, S., & FuentesAbeledo, E. J. (2020). Digital tools and personal learning environments: An analysis in higher education. Sustainability, 12(19), 8180. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198180
• Genc, S. Z., Engin, G., & Yardim, T. (2020). Postgraduate students’ views related to application of distance education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Atatürk Üniversitesi Kazım Karabekir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Ataturk University Kazim Karabekir Faculty of Education Journal], 41, 134-158. https://doi.org/10.33418/ataunikkefd.782142
• Gungoren, O. C., Bektas, M., Ozturk, E., & Horzum, M. B. (2014). Acceptence of TPC scale–Validity and reliability study. Education and Science, 39(176), 69-79. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3497
• Guo, Y., Piasta, S. B., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Relations among preschool teachers’ self-efficacy, classroom quality, and children’s language and literacy gains. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 1094-1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.005
• Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Examining the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy, their digital competence, strategies to evaluate information, and use of ICT at school. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(5), 555-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1172501
• Haynie, W. J. (1992). Post hoc analysis of test items written by technology education teachers. Journal of Technology Education, 4(1), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v4i1.a.3
• Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/thedifference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
• Karadag, N., & Ozgur, A. Z. (2021). Examination of learners’ views on assessment practices in Anadolu University open education system. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences], 21(2), 505-530. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.959264
• Karamustafaoglu, S., Caglak, A., & Meseci, B. (2012). Self-efficiency of primary school teachers related to the alternative testing and assessment tools. Amasya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Amasya University Faculty of Education Journal], 1(2), 167-179.
• Karasar, N.(2006). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi [Scientific research method]. Nobel Publishing.
• Kilic, M. Y. (2020). Investigation of self-efficacy of teachers in high schools for measurement and evaluation. Bayburt Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Bayburt Faculty of Education Journal], 15(30), 307-328. https://doi.org/10.35675/befdergi.686853
• Koc, A., Uzun, N. B., & Unaldi Coral, M. N. (2022). Development of the self-efficiency scale for online measurement and evaluation. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 8(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.1031155
• Kocaturk Kapucu, N., & Adnan, M. (2018). Uzaktan öğretimde çevrimiçi eğitmen başarısının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of online instructor success in distance education]. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 15(1), 7-20.
• Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741319300303
• Kolcu, G., Demir, S., & Kolcu, M. I. B. (2020). Evaluation of online measurement and evaluation applications. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi [Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Health Sciences], 11(3), 330-333.
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE] (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (3., 4., 5., 6., 7. ve 8. sınıflar) [Science course curriculum (Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8)]. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201812312311937-FEN%20BİLİMLERİ%20ÖĞRETİM%20PROGRAMI2018.pdf
• Okur, M., & Azar, A. (2011). Primary teachers’ opinions about alternative measurement and assessment techniques used in science and technology course. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi [Kastamonu Education Magazine], 19(2), 387-400.
• Oren, F. S., Ormanci, U., & Evrekli, E. (2014). The alternative assessment-evaluation approaches preferred by pre-service teachers and their self-efficacy towards these approaches. Education and Science, 39(173), 103-117.
• Ozalkan, G. S. (2021). Measurement and evaluation in distance education: Rethinking social sciences education during the pandemic. International Journal of Economics Administrative and Social Sciences, 4, 18-26.
• Pekcan, N., & Toraman, C. (2022). Investigation of online measurement and evaluation applications in COVID-19 pandemia according to teacher-student opinions. Erzincan University Journal of Education Faculty, 24(1), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.17556/erziefd.862654
• Sad, S., & Nalcaci, O. (2015). Prospective teachers’ perceived competencies about ıntegrating ınformation and communication technologies into education. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 11(1),177-197.
• Stanford, P., & Reeves, S. (2005). Assessment that drives instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 37(4), 18-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990503700402
• Steer, K., Gang, L., Layfield, C., & Borg, J. (2016). Assessment in e-learning for higher education. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Management.
• Tekedere, H., Sahin, S., & Goker, H. (2022). An Investigation of student experiences about online distance education at higher education in the COVID-19 term. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Gazi University Gazi Faculty of Education Journal], 42(1), 123-166. https://doi.org/10.17152/gefad.871254
• Ulas, H., & Ozan, C. (2010). The qualification level of primary school teachers’ use of educational technology. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi [Ataturk University Social Sciences Institute Journal], 14(1), 63-84.
• Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., & Qin, Q. (2020). Unique epidemiological and clinical features of the emerging 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) implicate special control measures. Journal of Medical Virology, 92(6), 568-576. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25748
• WHO. (2020). WHO Director-General’s remarks at the media briefing on 2019-nCoV on 11 February 2020. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-remarks-at-themedia-briefing-on-2019-ncov-on-11-february-2020
• Yaralİ, D. (2017). The analysis of teacher candidates’competency perceptions toward measurement and assessment (example of Kafkas Universty). Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi [Abant İzzet Baysal University Faculty of Education Journal], 17(1), 487-504. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2017.17.28551-304650
• Yenice, N., Ozden, B., & Alpak Tunc, G. (2017). Examination of the selfefficacy of pre-service teachers about the use of alternative assessment approaches. Amasya Education Journal, 6(2), 367-397.
• Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, A. J. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers’ self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323-342. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324818AME1604_4
• Zimmerman, W. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2016). Online learning self-efficacy in students with and without online learning experience. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(3), 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1193801

APA

Karakaya, F., Selcuk, E., & Yilmaz, M. (2023). Investigation of science teachers’ self-efficacy for online measurement and evaluation. Pedagogical Research, 8(4), em0174. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13851

Vancouver

Karakaya F, Selcuk E, Yilmaz M. Investigation of science teachers’ self-efficacy for online measurement and evaluation. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2023;8(4):em0174. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13851

AMA

Karakaya F, Selcuk E, Yilmaz M. Investigation of science teachers’ self-efficacy for online measurement and evaluation. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2023;8(4), em0174. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13851

Chicago

Karakaya, Ferhat, Eray Selcuk, and Mehmet Yilmaz. "Investigation of science teachers’ self-efficacy for online measurement and evaluation". Pedagogical Research 2023 8 no. 4 (2023): em0174. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13851

Harvard

Karakaya, F., Selcuk, E., and Yilmaz, M. (2023). Investigation of science teachers’ self-efficacy for online measurement and evaluation. Pedagogical Research, 8(4), em0174. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13851

MLA

Karakaya, Ferhat et al. "Investigation of science teachers’ self-efficacy for online measurement and evaluation". Pedagogical Research, vol. 8, no. 4, 2023, em0174. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/13851