Pedagogical Research

• Adu-Gyamfi, K., & Anim-Eduful, B. (2022). Interaction effect of gender, across school-type on upper-secondary students’ development of experimental reasoning on organic qualitative analysis. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(3), 351-365. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.351
• Adu-Gyamfi, K., Ampiah, J. G., & Agyei, D. D. (2018). Teachers’ problems of teaching of oxidation-reduction reactions in high schools. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(5), 53-71.
• Adu-Gyamfi, K., Ampiah, J. G., & Appiah, J. Y. (2017). Students’ difficulties in IUPAC naming of organic compounds. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 77-101.
• Anim-Eduful, B. (2020). Chemistry teachers’ and students’ conceptual understanding of organic qualitative analysis [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Cape Coast.
• Anim-Eduful, B., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2021). Functional groups detection: Do chemistry teachers demonstrate conceptual difficulties in teaching? Global Journal of Human-Social Science: G Linguistics & Education, 21(7), 47-60. https://doi.org/10.34257/GJHSSGVOL21IS7PG47
• Anim-Eduful, B., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2022). Factors influencing high school chemistry teachers’ and students’ teaching and learning of organic qualitative analysis: A qualitative study. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(7), 194-219.
• Atkins, P.W., & Beran, J. A. (1992). General chemistry. Scientific American Books.
• Atkins, R. C., & Carey, F. A. (1990). Organic chemistry a brief course. McGraw-Hill.
• Bettelheim, F. A., Brown, W. H., & March, J. (2004). Introduction to organic and biochemistry. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
• Bhattacharyya, G., & Bodner, G. M. (2005). It gets me to the product: How students propose organic mechanisms. Journal of Chemical Education, 82(9), 1402-1407. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed082p1402
• Boo, H. K. (1994). ‘A’ level chemistry students’ conceptions and understandings of the nature of chemistry content [Unpublished PhD thesis]. University of London.
• Chavan, R. (2017). Difficulties encountered by science teachers during teaching concepts of science. Physical Science Education Journal, 1, 1-9.
• Childs, P. E., & Sheehan, M. (2009). What’s difficult about chemistry? An Irish perspective. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 10, 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1039/b914499b
• Chiu, M. H. (2005). A national survey of students’ conceptions in chemistry in Taiwan. Chemical Education International, 6(1), 1-8.
• Coll, R. K., & Treagust, D. F. (2001). Learners’ mental models of chemical bonding. Research in Science Education, 3(1), 357-382. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013159927352
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
• Domin, D. S., Al-Masum, M., & Mensah, J. (2008). Students’ categorizations of organic compounds. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9, 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1039/B806226A
• Duffy, A. M. (2006). Students’ ways of understanding aromaticity and electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California, San Diego.
• Ebbing, D. D., & Gammon, S. D. (2005). General chemistry. Houghton Mifflin Company.
• Fieser, L. F., & Williamson, K. L. (1992). Organic experiments. Heath and Company.
• Goh, N. K., Toh, K. A., & Chia, L. S. (1987). The effect of modified laboratory instruction on students’ achievement in chemistry practical. Institute of Education.
• Graulich, N. (2015). The tip of the iceberg in organic chemistry classes: How do students deal with the invisible? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16, 9-21. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RP00165F
• Grove, N. P., & Bretz, S. L. (2012). A continuum of learning: from rote memorization to meaningful learning in organic chemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 13, 201-208. https://doi.org/10.1039/C1RP90069B
• Hanson, R. (2017). Enhancing students’ performance in organic chemistry through context-based learning and micro activities. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 5(6), 7-20.
• Hassan, A. K., Hill, R. A., & Reid, N. (2004). Ideas underpinning success in an introductory course in organic chemistry. The Royal Society of Chemistry: University Chemistry Education, 8, 40-51.
• Jia, Q. (2010). A brief study on the implication of constructivism teaching theory on classroom teaching reform in basic education. International Education Studies, 3(2), 197-199. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v3n2p197
• Kang, N. H., & Howren, C. (2004). Teaching for conceptual understanding: Science and children. National Science Teachers Association, 42(1), 28-32.
• Konicek-Moran, R., & Keeley, P. (2015). Teaching for conceptual understanding in science. NSTA Press.
• Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9, 105-143. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0902_1
• Marais, P., & Jordaan, F. (2000). Are we taking symbolic language for granted? Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1355-1357. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p1355
• Mills, S. (2016). Conceptual understanding: A concept analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2(3), 546-557. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2308
• Ministry of Education. (2010). Teaching syllabus for chemistry: Senior high school 1- 3.
• Moe, M. J. (2011). Conceptual understanding of science through archaeological inquiry [Unpublished Ed.D. thesis]. Montana State University.
• Nicoll, G. (2001). A report of undergraduates’ bonding misconceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 707-730. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690010025012
• Nieswandt, M. (2007). Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 908-937. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20169
• Stieff, S. (2007). Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science curriculum and instruction. Learning and Instruction, 17, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.012
• Tang, A. Y. C., Zain, M, S., & Abdullah, R. (2010). Development and evaluation of a chemistry educational software for learning organic reactions using qualitative reasoning. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 3(4), 129-138.
• Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2013). Effect of a virtual chemistry laboratory on students’ achievement. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (1), 159-170.
• Tsoi, M. F. (1994). Effects of different instructional methods on interpretation skills in chemical qualitative analysis [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National University of Singapore.
• WAEC. (2001). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2003). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2004). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2005). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2006). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2007). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2012). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2014). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2015). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2016). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2017). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• WAEC. (2018). West Africa senior secondary certificate examination (school candidates). Chief examiners’ report science, May/June.
• Wasacz, J. T. (2010). Organic chemistry preconceptions and their correlation to student success [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Northern Colorado.

APA

Anim-Eduful, B., & Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2022). Chemistry students’ conceptual understanding of organic qualitative analysis. Pedagogical Research, 7(4), em0132. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12307

Vancouver

Anim-Eduful B, Adu-Gyamfi K. Chemistry students’ conceptual understanding of organic qualitative analysis. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2022;7(4):em0132. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12307

AMA

Anim-Eduful B, Adu-Gyamfi K. Chemistry students’ conceptual understanding of organic qualitative analysis. PEDAGOGICAL RES. 2022;7(4), em0132. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12307

Chicago

Anim-Eduful, Benjamin, and Kenneth Adu-Gyamfi. "Chemistry students’ conceptual understanding of organic qualitative analysis". Pedagogical Research 2022 7 no. 4 (2022): em0132. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12307

Harvard

Anim-Eduful, B., and Adu-Gyamfi, K. (2022). Chemistry students’ conceptual understanding of organic qualitative analysis. Pedagogical Research, 7(4), em0132. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12307

MLA

Anim-Eduful, Benjamin et al. "Chemistry students’ conceptual understanding of organic qualitative analysis". Pedagogical Research, vol. 7, no. 4, 2022, em0132. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12307